By defintion, capitalism implies that the lender takes full risk when he makes a loan. However, its clear that nothing like that applies in reality. What we have instead is a privatization of profit (yes, the capitalist definitely keeps all his profits, also trickle-down theories are a load of crap), but if something goes wrong, then the public has to bear the brunt of the cost (externalization, as it's sometimes called to just to disguise what it really means). If it's not yet clear, the current system works as follows : Privatize Profit, Socialize Risk.
For example, consider these events recently:
The state (undoubtedly that means that the public bears the brunt) rescued the shady hedge funds/investment banks by offering vast sums of money and rate cuts. Apparently, this is through the "overnight discount window". Only it isn't overnight, it's for 30 days, and can be extended for free. It would be nice if all our credit cards had such nice terms. Not! Note that the same banks have made billions (or trillions ?) from the same hedge funds. Where are all the profits ? Offshore banking, perhaps. And why should the public bail these "capitalists" ? What a load of bullshit.
With the Northern Rock debacle, Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, not content with rescuing just one bank, grandly announced that all failing banks would have their deposits guaranteed by the taxpayer.
And, then we had the recent Fed interest rate cut. What this means is more cheap cash for Wall Street (yay! soaring stock prices, but shaft the public) and more devaluation of the dollar which means higher prices for food and energy. Ultimately, it's the public that gets shafted. Anyway, if it were truly "free" market, why do we have the Fed regulating interest rates ?
References:
Bernacke's Bail Out of Wall Street
Fed drops the Inflation Bomb
The Era of Global Financial Instability
IMF/WB Debt Forgiveness
The Gotterdammerung of Central Banking